MOD 1 : N=4 SYM and the friendly cusps Oct 14, 2016 I inaugurate this "memo of the day" series with a little fact about the arguably most well-known four-dimensional superconformal theory in four dimensions, $\mathcal{N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills. It has a conformal manifold labeled by a unique number $\tau$, the complexified coupling constant. The weak coupling regime is the limit $\mathrm{Im}(\tau) = \frac{4 \pi }{g^2} \rightarrow \infty$, and in this regime we have a good Lagrangian description. An elegant way of talking about this limit is to simply say that the Lagrangian description is valid around the cusp of the symmetry group $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$. Here I say "the" cusp, because a cusp is an equivalence class, but one should not forget that it contains many (an infinite number of) points. Let us recall the definition of a cusp. Given a subgroup $\Gamma$ of $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ and a point $z \in \mathfrak{H} \cup \mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}$, we say that $z$ is an elliptic point if it is the fixed point of some elliptic element of $\Gamma$; $z$ is a cusp if it is the fixed point of some parabolic element of $\Gamma$. I recall that $\alpha \in \Gamma \subset SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ is elliptic (resp. parabolic) if and only if $|\mathrm{tr} \, \alpha| <2$ (resp. $|\mathrm{tr} \, \alpha| =2$). One can show that elliptic points are always in $\mathfrak{H}$ while cusps are always in $\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}$. And it so happens that if we choose $\Gamma = SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$, the cusps are exactly the points in $\mathbb{Q} \cup \{\infty\}$, and they form only one conjugacy class of $SL(2,\mathbb{Z})$. This is why we say that the modular group has only one cusp, which is $\mathbb{Q} \cup \{\infty\}$. Let us go back to the $\mathcal{N}=4$ theory. The points in the cusp are precisely the points where we can have a good Lagrangian description. For one of these points, $\{\infty\}$, the theory is weakly coupled, and for the other points, that is the elements of $\mathbb{Q}$, there is an equivalent description which is weakly coupled, obtained using a duality. For instance, the point $\tau = 0 \in \mathbb{Q}$ is related to $\{\infty\}$ by the standard $S$-duality. Next time, we will begin an adventurous journey to the inland of the coupling space, even rubbing shoulders with the elliptic points, leaving behind the friendly cusps, which are somewhat paradoxically those singular points of the upper half-plane where things are under perturbative control. Please enable JavaScript to view the comments powered by Disqus.